Skip to main content

Introduction to the Regenerative Medicine Industry (Webinar #1) – Oct 2016

Regenerate // The Global Cell & Gene Therapy Podcast
Regenerate // The Global Cell & Gene Therapy Podcast
Introduction to the Regenerative Medicine Industry (Webinar #1) - Oct 2016

Session 1: Introduction to the Regenerative Medicine Industry (Webinar)

Lot of innovation. There has been plenty of innovation in the past 5-10 years in regenerative medicine. A traditionally overlooked, but essential, area of innovation is manufacturing: Without the ability to scale up for mass production, a new technology is highly likely to fail. Accordingly, a lot of innovation was put into this side of regenerative medicine recently by a diverse range of companies.

Financing is “white hot”, but cooling off. Most of the funds now come from public investment. The preferred way of raising funds is venture capital. Initial Public Offerings do not meet their targets.

Clinical trial success is mixed. 728 clinical trials are under way as per the second quarter of 2016 (Phase I: 223; Phase II: 439; Phase III: 66). Regenerative medicine therapies will have to demonstrate a much higher standard of care compared to alternatives to justify the high price point and to ensure the long-term success of the field.

Commercial success has not been achieved yet. More than 700 regenerative medicine companies have been set up worldwide. The majority of these are in North America (371), followed by Europe and Israel at 195, and Asia with 112. Cost has to be pushed down, the supply chain improved. Health-economic research is essential. A start-up should invest into demonstrating the health-economic benefit of its product, and also into better understanding the mechanism of action of its therapy as this has significant implications on how clinical trials will need to be designed and what patient groups must be targeted.

Some of the most common reasons for failure are: The discovery/invention does not fit well with industrial needs; the discovery/invention cannot be scaled up, the benefits that the discovery/invention provides is not worth the expenses of commercialisation. Not all interesting scientific solutions are fiscally worthwhile to pursue; target market, market analysis or business plan are not right due to lack of experience; and the “fish out of the water” effect: It is hard for a scientist to suddenly become a businessman.


Dr. Nihal Engin Vrana
VP of Scientific Affairs
PROTiP Medical, France

Dr. Christopher Gemmiti
Business Development Lead
Wyss Institute, Harvard University, USA

Links mentioned:


We would like to thank our sponsors, PROTiP Medical & Immodgel.

Contact us at [email protected]
For more information, please visit

Leave a Reply